You are currently viewing Pros and cons of kneeling during the national anthem

Pros and cons of kneeling during the national anthem

Because of kneeling or sitting in protest during the national anthem, Colin Kaepernick was set on fire in 2016 and escalated to become a controversial national topic. Many more professional football players, junior high students, or sports stars in other sports also refused to stand up for the national anthem. These demonstrations generated controversy and prompted a national conversation about protesters’ statements and how they wanted to deliver them.

 

Pros

1. Pays attention to inequality: Although people strive to reflect equality in America, many minority groups in the nation do not have equal rights to peace and prosperity. Kneeling or deciding not to take a stand for a national anthem is indeed a way to bring further attention to people in the communities, throughout the press, or even in the justice system.

2. Honor among those who have protected the nation: Once Kaepernick began his protests for the first time, he decided to stay on the bench beside the Gatorade containers before revealing anything. He instead shifted to a kneeling aspect of the actions because using it was much more respectful to military veterans and their families than that of remaining sitting.

3. Tradition:  Athletes from the United States used the position to make their impact mostly on each day’s policies. Tommie Smith and John Carlos lifted a black power gesture from the podium at the 1968 Olympic Games, which expelled both from the rest of the game and threatened both to execution.

4. People’s Consciousness: There’s too much turmoil happening on throughout the world today, but it isn’t very comforting since we, as a world, must band together unity. This protest raises the public’s understanding of what’s going on throughout our world. The NFL players want our world to start together rather than moving against one another. It’s why players keep kneeling till the injustice, inequality, and brutality of cops come to an end.

5. The way to advocate for justice: The only position where everyone can find any compromise is the need for justice. Both parties are standing, seated, or kneeling because they want a fair outcome. Each person wants an opportunity to pursue life, liberty, and happiness with their experience in you. It is easier to identify solutions by reacting to how each party would have to tell.

 

Cons

1. Kneeling and not standing throughout the national anthem rarely happens at home: That critical point is one that often drives debate on whether or not to kneel or decide not to stand. Although there are people that say those who are standing when the national anthem plays on TV once they’re home, many citizens shouldn’t.

2. Ineffective way: The absence of standing for a national anthem is also an ineffective way of promoting a purpose

3. Refusal will stand for a national anthem is alienating U.S. citizens: Refusal will stand for a national anthem is alienating U.S. citizens and creating division in the community—most Kaepernick fan friends-well, not more fan friends-burn the jersey to show their opposition to the behavior. A clip of a flame jersey posted on Facebook says, “He says he’s oppressed by making $126 million. Well, Colin, that’s also another welcome for everyone.

4. Kneeling or refusing to stand sheds light on inconsistent police policies: The reality of racial violence in the United States is perplexing and contentious, but it still exists. An African-American is arrested on robbing hospital equipment charges because he was walking outside with the IV connected. After all, security officers reported that he had been trying to leave with it.

5. Controversial: The players are dishonoring the soldiers that have fought and are currently fighting for that team’s freedom of peaceful protest. This is not that players should not protest in some way or way if they feel it needs to be done, but it is not the time or place to do this on live TV at the ceremonial period.

Leave a Reply